I have to admit to being a bit sniffy about Twitter. I took a look at the public area of their website (see image) a while ago and was a bit put off. Then I realised I was falling into the trap that so many people fell into when they dismissed blogs on the basis of who they perceived were using them and what they were using them for.
I remind myself. It's not about content its about the underlying functionality and the network of people using it, or potentially using it. Anyone can use twitter (or any other technology) for whatever content they like. Contrast twitter's public feed with the view I get of twitter: Interesting mini observations and calls for help from trusted friends, a feed from the BBC on technology and the rural news from xPRESS Digest.
So twitter, like everything else, is what you make it. The real question is: "Is the network of Twitter users relevant to ruralnet? Are there people using Twitter that would appreciate ruralnet|online services delivered to them in this way?"
To try and find out and as part of an experiment, I have set up a Twitter account called 'ruralnet_xpress' and each day I am pasting the day's rural headlines to it. So far ruralnet_xpress has two followers me and Paul Webster - cheers Paul! If you're a Twitter user and would like a daily dose of rural headlines, you know what to do.